The Breadcrumbs widget will appear here on the published site.
REPOST of article by Utah Freedom Coalition (original post 22 April 2022). Find at UtahFreedomCoalition.org
Start off asking a really basic question (looking at you Utah): Why do states, a select few more than others, continue to run "pilot" programs? Pilot programs that can fundamentally change their state, that can and do remove privacy and freedom. Why would a state jump on voting pilot programs? (Side note we'll have a post dedicated just to Pilot Programs in Utah soon).
CHECK OUT OUR VIDEO ON VOATZ/RCV/PILOT PROGRAMS HERE AND THE PPT "Ranked Choice Voting and Mobile Voting: Follow the Money"
A document to just take a little peek at before you really get going is here- A security analysis of VOATZ
Would it not be wise to observe and see how these, in some cases, extreme ideas/programs etc. behave and turnout? Now we are sure you're asking, "but surely they get the publics vote on these before installing them?" We sadly can report that no, no indeed they do not. They will argue that you (the people they are supposed to represent) needed to show up to every council meeting about this, and interim oh and special sessions if applicable... oh and regular session etc. Until recently were many of you watching all these meetings? Did you even know there was an interim session? (Some of us have jobs). Luckily SB49 did NOT pass. The state of Utah was saved sort of sorry Utah County you're on your own.
Now, let's ask some questions:
Utah ask why we would want to move voting to an app? Be it VOATZ or this fun one https://www.fvap.gov/utah that goes by no name... yet. (Yes, it literally says Utah Online Voting)
Do apps require internet to be activated and used? To submit data? Is this secure?
Is blockchain the savior it's touted to be? Nothing can hack blockchain right? Well, that's not true. What happens when and if the voting system is hacked? Read "10 of the Biggest Crypto Heists of 2022...So Far"
Why would the UTGOP support this? I wonder if this could ever tie into the Digital ID (or DDL, or mDL)? Check out a video we did explaining just how this ties together.
Could it be they want the machines removed? That the evolution they have envisioned for total control over our elections move from paper to machines and now to apps? If you demand removal of machines (and you should) please make sure your county and or state has not already signed contracts with VOATZ or other similar type of programs. They'll use it as the sneaky "fix".
Here is a bit about the good ole' VOATZ app in Utah County
Source from VOATZ "The Utah County mobile voting option will be offered in addition to the current absentee options (mail, fax, and email). For uniformed military and overseas citizens, jurisdictions are required by law to send the ballot to voters 45 days prior to the election, allowing sufficient time for the ballots to be returned and counted. Ballots sent to participating voters using the Voatz application will be received within minutes, rather than days or sometimes weeks, and can be returned to the jurisdiction the instant the voter submits their ballot. The ballots that the jurisdiction receives are formatted, printed, and tabulated per standard procedure, and contain an anonymous ID that can be used for a rigorous post-election audit.
To use the Voatz platform, eligible voters must submit an absentee ballot request to their election office indicating a preference for mobile voting, and then complete an authentication process on the Voatz application.
The pilot is a collaboration between Voatz, Utah County, Tusk Philanthropies, and the National Cybersecurity Center. To learn more, read the press releases from Tusk Philanthropies."
But just in case all that wasn't enough for you take a look below- this is from Deseret News. Source below
Quotes below should say it all
"SALT LAKE CITY — Even as the tumult surrounding 2020 election processes and results continues, Utah lawmakers are looking ahead to potential new ways to help residents easily and securely engage their civic voting duties.
An interim legislative committee this week advanced a proposal from Rep. Mike Winder aiming to expand opportunities for Utah cities interested in testing new, internet-based systems that allow voters to cast their ballots via smartphone.
Utah County Clerk/Auditor Amelia Powers Gardner told members of the Government Operations Interim Committee that her county has been piloting just such a system, making it available to overseas voters, for the last two years with positive results.
“This bill would be a pilot project to allow a municipality or a city to opt in to allowing a broader base of their voters to utilize a mobile phone or an electronic means of casting their ballots,” Powers Gardner said. “Utah County has currently been utilizing this system for the past five elections ... and in this most recent election we had over 1,000 people utilize a system like this.”"
CODE RED ABOVE- THIS IS THE SAME LANGUAGE FOR THE RCV PILOT PROGRAM NIGHTMARE WE ARE DEALING WITH.
The Recommended Posts widget will appear here on the published site.
The Blog Search will appear here on the published site.
results for you
We've got nothin'!
E_Moore is a Utah resident who has decided to give back and get involved! Read to learn more about a variety topics surrounding election issues facing Utah.